Minerals Technologies Stock Piotroski F Score

MTX Stock  USD 81.13  2.07  2.49%   
This module uses fundamental data of Minerals Technologies to approximate its Piotroski F score. Minerals Technologies F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Minerals Technologies. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Minerals Technologies financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Minerals Technologies Altman Z Score, Minerals Technologies Correlation, Minerals Technologies Valuation, as well as analyze Minerals Technologies Alpha and Beta and Minerals Technologies Hype Analysis.
For more information on how to buy Minerals Stock please use our How to Invest in Minerals Technologies guide.
  
At this time, Minerals Technologies' Short and Long Term Debt Total is fairly stable compared to the past year. Net Debt is likely to rise to about 786.1 M in 2024, whereas Long Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 462.7 M in 2024. At this time, Minerals Technologies' Payables Turnover is fairly stable compared to the past year. Cash Per Share is likely to rise to 10.39 in 2024, whereas Days Sales Outstanding is likely to drop 56.05 in 2024.
At this time, it appears that Minerals Technologies' Piotroski F Score is Strong. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
7.0
Piotroski F Score - Strong
Current Return On Assets

Positive

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Decreased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Positive

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Decrease

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Lower Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Decrease

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

Increase

Focus

Minerals Technologies Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Minerals Technologies is to make sure Minerals is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Minerals Technologies' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Minerals Technologies' financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Return On Assets0.02390.0251
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Asset Turnover0.840.6484
Significantly Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.310.2337
Significantly Up
Very volatile
Total Current Liabilities232.2 M457.3 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total612.4 M1.2 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets1.7 B3.3 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets597.7 M1.1 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Cash From Operating Activities161.3 M233.6 M
Way Down
Pretty Stable

Minerals Technologies F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Minerals Technologies' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Minerals Technologies in a much-optimized way.

About Minerals Technologies Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Common Stock Shares Outstanding

31.9 Million

At this time, Minerals Technologies' Common Stock Shares Outstanding is fairly stable compared to the past year.

Minerals Technologies ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Minerals Technologies' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Minerals Technologies' managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Minerals Technologies Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Minerals Technologies's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Minerals Technologies using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Minerals Technologies based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.

Additional Tools for Minerals Stock Analysis

When running Minerals Technologies' price analysis, check to measure Minerals Technologies' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Minerals Technologies is operating at the current time. Most of Minerals Technologies' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Minerals Technologies' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Minerals Technologies' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Minerals Technologies to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.