Mind Technology Stock Piotroski F Score

MIND Stock  USD 7.05  0.08  1.12%   
This module uses fundamental data of Mind Technology to approximate its Piotroski F score. Mind Technology F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Mind Technology. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Mind Technology financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Mind Technology Altman Z Score, Mind Technology Correlation, Mind Technology Valuation, as well as analyze Mind Technology Alpha and Beta and Mind Technology Hype Analysis.
For information on how to trade Mind Stock refer to our How to Trade Mind Stock guide.
  
At present, Mind Technology's Total Debt To Capitalization is projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Debt Equity Ratio is expected to grow to 0.13, whereas Net Debt is projected to grow to (4.3 M). At present, Mind Technology's Days Of Inventory On Hand is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Research And Ddevelopement To Revenue is expected to grow to 0.05, whereas Dividend Yield is forecasted to decline to 0.06.
At this time, it appears that Mind Technology's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
5.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
Current Return On Assets

Negative

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Decreased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Negative

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Decreasing

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Increase

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Lower Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Decrease

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

Increase

Focus

Mind Technology Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Mind Technology is to make sure Mind is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Mind Technology's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Mind Technology's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Asset Turnover1.030.98
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities11.8 M11.8 M
Slightly Up
Very volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total626 K659 K
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets36.6 M38.5 M
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets34.3 M32.6 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile

Mind Technology F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Mind Technology's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Mind Technology in a much-optimized way.

About Mind Technology Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Book Value Per Share

13.77

At present, Mind Technology's Book Value Per Share is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting.

Mind Technology ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Mind Technology's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Mind Technology's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Mind Technology Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Mind Technology's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Mind Technology using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Mind Technology based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
When determining whether Mind Technology is a strong investment it is important to analyze Mind Technology's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Mind Technology's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Mind Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Mind Technology Altman Z Score, Mind Technology Correlation, Mind Technology Valuation, as well as analyze Mind Technology Alpha and Beta and Mind Technology Hype Analysis.
For information on how to trade Mind Stock refer to our How to Trade Mind Stock guide.
You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.
Is Oil & Gas Equipment & Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Mind Technology. If investors know Mind will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Mind Technology listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share
6
Revenue Per Share
18.596
Quarterly Revenue Growth
1.434
Return On Assets
0.1205
Return On Equity
0.1954
The market value of Mind Technology is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Mind that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Mind Technology's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Mind Technology's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Mind Technology's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Mind Technology's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Mind Technology's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Mind Technology is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Mind Technology's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.