This module uses fundamental data of Cisco Systems to approximate its Piotroski F score. Cisco Systems F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Cisco Systems. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Cisco Systems financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Cisco Systems Altman Z Score, Cisco Systems Correlation, Cisco Systems Valuation, as well as analyze Cisco Systems Alpha and Beta and Cisco Systems Hype Analysis.
At this time, Cisco Systems' Debt Equity Ratio is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of February 2025, Debt Ratio is likely to grow to 0.14, while Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to drop about 18.1 B. At this time, Cisco Systems' Free Cash Flow Per Share is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of February 2025, ROIC is likely to grow to 0.19, while Dividend Yield is likely to drop 0.02.
At this time, it appears that Cisco Systems' Piotroski F Score is Strong. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Cisco Systems is to make sure Cisco is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Cisco Systems' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Cisco Systems' financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Cisco Systems' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Cisco Systems in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Book Value Per Share
10.26
At this time, Cisco Systems' Book Value Per Share is very stable compared to the past year.
Cisco Systems ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Cisco Systems' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Cisco Systems' managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Cisco Systems Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Cisco Systems's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Cisco Systems using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Cisco Systems based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cisco Systems will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Cisco Systems could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Cisco Systems when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Cisco Systems - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Cisco Systems to buy it.
The correlation of Cisco Systems is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Cisco Systems moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Cisco Systems moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Cisco Systems can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
When determining whether Cisco Systems offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Cisco Systems' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Cisco Systems Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Cisco Systems Stock:
To learn how to invest in Cisco Stock, please use our How to Invest in Cisco Systems guide.You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.
Is Communications Equipment space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Cisco Systems. If investors know Cisco will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Cisco Systems listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.06)
Dividend Share
1.6
Earnings Share
2.28
Revenue Per Share
13.517
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.094
The market value of Cisco Systems is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Cisco that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Cisco Systems' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Cisco Systems' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Cisco Systems' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Cisco Systems' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Cisco Systems' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Cisco Systems is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Cisco Systems' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.