At this time, it appears that Collective Mining's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized
Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of
predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
6.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
| Change in Return on Assets | |
| Cash Flow Return on Assets | |
| Current Quality of Earnings (accrual) | |
| Long Term Debt Over Assets Change | |
| Change In Outstending Shares | |
Collective Mining Piotroski F Score Drivers
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Collective Mining is to make sure Collective is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Collective Mining's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Collective Mining's financial numbers are properly reported.
Collective Mining F Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical
financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Collective Mining's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Collective Mining in a much-optimized way.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Collective Mining Piotroski F Score
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled
Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Collective Mining Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Collective Mining from analyzing Collective Mining's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Collective Mining's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Collective Mining's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
| | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (projected) |
| Market Cap | | 112.0M | 101.0M | 134.3M | 161.2M | 185.4M | 176.1M |
| Enterprise Value | | 110.5M | 84.9M | 125.8M | 147.1M | 169.2M | 160.8M |
Collective Mining ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Collective Mining's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Collective Mining's managers, analysts, and investors.
About Collective Mining Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Collective Mining's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Collective Mining using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of Collective Mining based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectWhen determining whether Collective Mining is a strong investment it is important to analyze Collective Mining's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Collective Mining's
future performance.
For an informed investment choice regarding Collective Stock, refer to the following important reports: Is Precious Metals space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost
the valuation of Collective Mining. If investors know Collective will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Collective Mining listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Collective Mining is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Collective that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Collective Mining's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Collective Mining's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Collective Mining's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Collective Mining's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Collective Mining's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine
if Collective Mining is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Collective Mining's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.