Correlation Between Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Zebra Technologies with a short position of United Microelectronics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics.

Diversification Opportunities for Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics

-0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Zebra and United is -0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on United Microelectronics and Zebra Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Zebra Technologies are associated (or correlated) with United Microelectronics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of United Microelectronics has no effect on the direction of Zebra Technologies i.e., Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Zebra Technologies is expected to generate 0.81 times more return on investment than United Microelectronics. However, Zebra Technologies is 1.24 times less risky than United Microelectronics. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. United Microelectronics is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  32,887  in Zebra Technologies on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  8,117  from holding Zebra Technologies or generate 24.68% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Zebra Technologies  vs.  United Microelectronics

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Zebra Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zebra Technologies are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unfluctuating basic indicators, Zebra Technologies sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
United Microelectronics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days United Microelectronics has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics

The main advantage of trading using opposite Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Zebra Technologies position performs unexpectedly, United Microelectronics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in United Microelectronics will offset losses from the drop in United Microelectronics' long position.
The idea behind Zebra Technologies and United Microelectronics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Directory module to find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk