Correlation Between Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Zebra Technologies with a short position of UnitedHealth Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group.
Diversification Opportunities for Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group
0.81 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Zebra and UnitedHealth is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group Incorporate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on UnitedHealth Group and Zebra Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Zebra Technologies are associated (or correlated) with UnitedHealth Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of UnitedHealth Group has no effect on the direction of Zebra Technologies i.e., Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Zebra Technologies is expected to under-perform the UnitedHealth Group. In addition to that, Zebra Technologies is 1.65 times more volatile than UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. It trades about -0.19 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 4,520 in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated on December 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (284.00) from holding UnitedHealth Group Incorporated or give up 6.28% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 98.36% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Zebra Technologies vs. UnitedHealth Group Incorporate
Performance |
Timeline |
Zebra Technologies |
UnitedHealth Group |
Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group
The main advantage of trading using opposite Zebra Technologies and UnitedHealth Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Zebra Technologies position performs unexpectedly, UnitedHealth Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in UnitedHealth Group will offset losses from the drop in UnitedHealth Group's long position.Zebra Technologies vs. Discover Financial Services | Zebra Technologies vs. Broadridge Financial Solutions, | Zebra Technologies vs. Melco Resorts Entertainment | Zebra Technologies vs. Darden Restaurants, |
UnitedHealth Group vs. Extra Space Storage | UnitedHealth Group vs. Check Point Software | UnitedHealth Group vs. Lumen Technologies, | UnitedHealth Group vs. Paycom Software |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.
Other Complementary Tools
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets |