Correlation Between Sino AG and Mount Gibson

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sino AG and Mount Gibson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sino AG and Mount Gibson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sino AG and Mount Gibson Iron, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sino AG and Mount Gibson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sino AG with a short position of Mount Gibson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sino AG and Mount Gibson.

Diversification Opportunities for Sino AG and Mount Gibson

-0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sino and Mount is -0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sino AG and Mount Gibson Iron in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mount Gibson Iron and Sino AG is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sino AG are associated (or correlated) with Mount Gibson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mount Gibson Iron has no effect on the direction of Sino AG i.e., Sino AG and Mount Gibson go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sino AG and Mount Gibson

Assuming the 90 days horizon Sino AG is expected to generate 0.54 times more return on investment than Mount Gibson. However, Sino AG is 1.85 times less risky than Mount Gibson. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mount Gibson Iron is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,250  in Sino AG on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,550  from holding Sino AG or generate 29.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sino AG  vs.  Mount Gibson Iron

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sino AG 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sino AG are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak basic indicators, Sino AG reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Mount Gibson Iron 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mount Gibson Iron has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Mount Gibson is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Sino AG and Mount Gibson Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sino AG and Mount Gibson

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sino AG and Mount Gibson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sino AG position performs unexpectedly, Mount Gibson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mount Gibson will offset losses from the drop in Mount Gibson's long position.
The effect of pair diversification on risk is to reduce it, but we should note this doesn't apply to all risk types. When we trade pairs against Sino AG as a counterpart, there is always some inherent risk that will never be diversified away no matter what. This volatility limits the effect of tactical diversification using pair trading. Sino AG's systematic risk is the inherent uncertainty of the entire market, and therefore cannot be mitigated even by pair-trading it against the equity that is not highly correlated to it. On the other hand, Sino AG's unsystematic risk describes the types of risk that we can protect against, at least to some degree, by selecting a matching pair that is not perfectly correlated to Sino AG.
The idea behind Sino AG and Mount Gibson Iron pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments