Correlation Between Xtrackers and SPDR ICE
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Xtrackers II and SPDR ICE BofA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Xtrackers and SPDR ICE and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Xtrackers with a short position of SPDR ICE. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Xtrackers and SPDR ICE.
Diversification Opportunities for Xtrackers and SPDR ICE
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Xtrackers and SPDR is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Xtrackers II and SPDR ICE BofA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SPDR ICE BofA and Xtrackers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Xtrackers II are associated (or correlated) with SPDR ICE. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SPDR ICE BofA has no effect on the direction of Xtrackers i.e., Xtrackers and SPDR ICE go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Xtrackers and SPDR ICE
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Xtrackers II is expected to under-perform the SPDR ICE. In addition to that, Xtrackers is 5.44 times more volatile than SPDR ICE BofA. It trades about -0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. SPDR ICE BofA is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 2,931 in SPDR ICE BofA on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (15.00) from holding SPDR ICE BofA or give up 0.51% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Xtrackers II vs. SPDR ICE BofA
Performance |
Timeline |
Xtrackers II |
SPDR ICE BofA |
Xtrackers and SPDR ICE Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Xtrackers and SPDR ICE
The main advantage of trading using opposite Xtrackers and SPDR ICE positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Xtrackers position performs unexpectedly, SPDR ICE can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SPDR ICE will offset losses from the drop in SPDR ICE's long position.Xtrackers vs. Xtrackers II Global | Xtrackers vs. Xtrackers FTSE | Xtrackers vs. Xtrackers SP 500 | Xtrackers vs. Xtrackers MSCI |
SPDR ICE vs. UBS Fund Solutions | SPDR ICE vs. Xtrackers II | SPDR ICE vs. Xtrackers Nikkei 225 | SPDR ICE vs. iShares VII PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |