Correlation Between BIST Electricity and KL Technology

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both BIST Electricity and KL Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining BIST Electricity and KL Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between BIST Electricity and KL Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on BIST Electricity and KL Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in BIST Electricity with a short position of KL Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of BIST Electricity and KL Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for BIST Electricity and KL Technology

0.61

Correlation Coefficient

BIST Electricity  KL Technology

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between BIST and KLTE is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BIST Electricity and KL Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KL Technology and BIST Electricity is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on BIST Electricity are associated (or correlated) with KL Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KL Technology has no effect on the direction of BIST Electricity i.e., BIST Electricity and KL Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between BIST Electricity and KL Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon BIST Electricity is expected to generate 0.9 times more return on investment than KL Technology. However, BIST Electricity is 1.11 times less risky than KL Technology. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KL Technology is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  56,118  in BIST Electricity on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (7,029) from holding BIST Electricity or give up 12.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	99.2%
Values	Daily Returns

BIST Electricity  vs.  KL Technology

Pair Trading with BIST Electricity and KL Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite BIST Electricity and KL Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if BIST Electricity position performs unexpectedly, KL Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KL Technology will offset losses from the drop in KL Technology's long position.

The idea behind BIST Electricity and KL Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.