Correlation Between Where Food and Glacier Bancorp

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Where Food and Glacier Bancorp at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Where Food and Glacier Bancorp into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Where Food Comes and Glacier Bancorp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Where Food and Glacier Bancorp and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Where Food with a short position of Glacier Bancorp. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Where Food and Glacier Bancorp.

Diversification Opportunities for Where Food and Glacier Bancorp

0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Where and Glacier is 0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Where Food Comes and Glacier Bancorp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Glacier Bancorp and Where Food is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Where Food Comes are associated (or correlated) with Glacier Bancorp. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Glacier Bancorp has no effect on the direction of Where Food i.e., Where Food and Glacier Bancorp go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Where Food and Glacier Bancorp

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Where Food Comes is expected to generate 0.85 times more return on investment than Glacier Bancorp. However, Where Food Comes is 1.18 times less risky than Glacier Bancorp. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Glacier Bancorp is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,078  in Where Food Comes on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  217.00  from holding Where Food Comes or generate 20.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Where Food Comes  vs.  Glacier Bancorp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Where Food Comes 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Where Food Comes are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile fundamental indicators, Where Food reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Glacier Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glacier Bancorp are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly fragile fundamental indicators, Glacier Bancorp demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Where Food and Glacier Bancorp Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Where Food and Glacier Bancorp

The main advantage of trading using opposite Where Food and Glacier Bancorp positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Where Food position performs unexpectedly, Glacier Bancorp can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Glacier Bancorp will offset losses from the drop in Glacier Bancorp's long position.
The idea behind Where Food Comes and Glacier Bancorp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume