Correlation Between Walker Dunlop and Graham
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Walker Dunlop and Graham Holdings 575, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Walker Dunlop and Graham and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Walker Dunlop with a short position of Graham. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Walker Dunlop and Graham.
Diversification Opportunities for Walker Dunlop and Graham
0.56 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Walker and Graham is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Walker Dunlop and Graham Holdings 575 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Graham Holdings 575 and Walker Dunlop is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Walker Dunlop are associated (or correlated) with Graham. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Graham Holdings 575 has no effect on the direction of Walker Dunlop i.e., Walker Dunlop and Graham go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Walker Dunlop and Graham
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Walker Dunlop is expected to generate 6.29 times more return on investment than Graham. However, Walker Dunlop is 6.29 times more volatile than Graham Holdings 575. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Graham Holdings 575 is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9,759 in Walker Dunlop on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (225.00) from holding Walker Dunlop or give up 2.31% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 62.5% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Walker Dunlop vs. Graham Holdings 575
Performance |
Timeline |
Walker Dunlop |
Graham Holdings 575 |
Walker Dunlop and Graham Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Walker Dunlop and Graham
The main advantage of trading using opposite Walker Dunlop and Graham positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Walker Dunlop position performs unexpectedly, Graham can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Graham will offset losses from the drop in Graham's long position.Walker Dunlop vs. Mr Cooper Group | Walker Dunlop vs. Velocity Financial Llc | Walker Dunlop vs. Security National Financial | Walker Dunlop vs. Encore Capital Group |
Graham vs. AEP TEX INC | Graham vs. US BANK NATIONAL | Graham vs. Texas Pacific Land | Graham vs. Truist Financial Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.
Other Complementary Tools
Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements |