Correlation Between Bank of China and Johnson Matthey

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of China and Johnson Matthey at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of China and Johnson Matthey into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of China and Johnson Matthey PLC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of China and Johnson Matthey and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of China with a short position of Johnson Matthey. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of China and Johnson Matthey.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of China and Johnson Matthey

-0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Johnson is -0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of China and Johnson Matthey PLC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Johnson Matthey PLC and Bank of China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of China are associated (or correlated) with Johnson Matthey. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Johnson Matthey PLC has no effect on the direction of Bank of China i.e., Bank of China and Johnson Matthey go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of China and Johnson Matthey

Assuming the 90 days horizon Bank of China is expected to generate 1.1 times more return on investment than Johnson Matthey. However, Bank of China is 1.1 times more volatile than Johnson Matthey PLC. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Johnson Matthey PLC is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  44.00  in Bank of China on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5.00  from holding Bank of China or generate 11.36% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of China  vs.  Johnson Matthey PLC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of China are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Bank of China may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Johnson Matthey PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Johnson Matthey PLC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Bank of China and Johnson Matthey Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of China and Johnson Matthey

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of China and Johnson Matthey positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of China position performs unexpectedly, Johnson Matthey can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Johnson Matthey will offset losses from the drop in Johnson Matthey's long position.
The idea behind Bank of China and Johnson Matthey PLC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios