Correlation Between Waste Management and Scientific Games

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Waste Management and Scientific Games at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Waste Management and Scientific Games into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Waste Management and Scientific Games, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Waste Management and Scientific Games and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Waste Management with a short position of Scientific Games. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Waste Management and Scientific Games.

Diversification Opportunities for Waste Management and Scientific Games

0.71

Correlation Coefficient

Waste Management  Scientific Games

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Waste and Scientific is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Waste Management and Scientific Games in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scientific Games and Waste Management is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Waste Management are associated (or correlated) with Scientific Games. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scientific Games has no effect on the direction of Waste Management i.e., Waste Management and Scientific Games go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Waste Management and Scientific Games

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Waste Management is expected to generate 2.98 times less return on investment than Scientific Games. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Waste Management is 2.03 times less risky than Scientific Games. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Scientific Games is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  8,100  in Scientific Games on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,400  from holding Scientific Games or generate 17.28% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Waste Management  vs.  Scientific Games

Waste Management

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Waste Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Waste Management is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Scientific Games reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Waste Management and Scientific Games

The main advantage of trading using opposite Waste Management and Scientific Games positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Waste Management position performs unexpectedly, Scientific Games can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will offset losses from the drop in Scientific Games' long position.

The idea behind Waste Management and Scientific Games pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.