Correlation Between Uber Technologies and Brinker International

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Uber Technologies and Brinker International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Uber Technologies and Brinker International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Uber Technologies and Brinker International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Uber Technologies and Brinker International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Uber Technologies with a short position of Brinker International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Uber Technologies and Brinker International.

Diversification Opportunities for Uber Technologies and Brinker International

-0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Uber and Brinker is -0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Uber Technologies and Brinker International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Brinker International and Uber Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Uber Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Brinker International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Brinker International has no effect on the direction of Uber Technologies i.e., Uber Technologies and Brinker International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Uber Technologies and Brinker International

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Uber Technologies is expected to under-perform the Brinker International. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Uber Technologies is 1.36 times less risky than Brinker International. The stock trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Brinker International is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  12,100  in Brinker International on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  500.00  from holding Brinker International or generate 4.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy94.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Uber Technologies  vs.  Brinker International

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Uber Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Uber Technologies has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Brinker International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Brinker International are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Brinker International reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Uber Technologies and Brinker International Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Uber Technologies and Brinker International

The main advantage of trading using opposite Uber Technologies and Brinker International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Uber Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Brinker International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Brinker International will offset losses from the drop in Brinker International's long position.
The idea behind Uber Technologies and Brinker International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance