Correlation Between California Bond and Mfs Servative

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both California Bond and Mfs Servative at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining California Bond and Mfs Servative into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between California Bond Fund and Mfs Servative Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on California Bond and Mfs Servative and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in California Bond with a short position of Mfs Servative. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of California Bond and Mfs Servative.

Diversification Opportunities for California Bond and Mfs Servative

0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between California and Mfs is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding California Bond Fund and Mfs Servative Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Servative Allocation and California Bond is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on California Bond Fund are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Servative. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Servative Allocation has no effect on the direction of California Bond i.e., California Bond and Mfs Servative go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between California Bond and Mfs Servative

Assuming the 90 days horizon California Bond Fund is expected to generate 0.24 times more return on investment than Mfs Servative. However, California Bond Fund is 4.17 times less risky than Mfs Servative. It trades about -0.33 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Servative Allocation is currently generating about -0.31 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,053  in California Bond Fund on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (19.00) from holding California Bond Fund or give up 1.8% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

California Bond Fund  vs.  Mfs Servative Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
California Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days California Bond Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, California Bond is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mfs Servative Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs Servative Allocation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking indicators, Mfs Servative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

California Bond and Mfs Servative Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with California Bond and Mfs Servative

The main advantage of trading using opposite California Bond and Mfs Servative positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if California Bond position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Servative can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Servative will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Servative's long position.
The idea behind California Bond Fund and Mfs Servative Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.