Correlation Between NISOURCE and United Guardian
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between NISOURCE FIN P and United Guardian, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on NISOURCE and United Guardian and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in NISOURCE with a short position of United Guardian. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of NISOURCE and United Guardian.
Diversification Opportunities for NISOURCE and United Guardian
0.28 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between NISOURCE and United is 0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding NISOURCE FIN P and United Guardian in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on United Guardian and NISOURCE is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on NISOURCE FIN P are associated (or correlated) with United Guardian. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of United Guardian has no effect on the direction of NISOURCE i.e., NISOURCE and United Guardian go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between NISOURCE and United Guardian
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon NISOURCE FIN P is expected to generate 0.29 times more return on investment than United Guardian. However, NISOURCE FIN P is 3.44 times less risky than United Guardian. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. United Guardian is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest 8,829 in NISOURCE FIN P on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (206.00) from holding NISOURCE FIN P or give up 2.33% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 87.69% |
Values | Daily Returns |
NISOURCE FIN P vs. United Guardian
Performance |
Timeline |
NISOURCE FIN P |
United Guardian |
NISOURCE and United Guardian Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with NISOURCE and United Guardian
The main advantage of trading using opposite NISOURCE and United Guardian positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if NISOURCE position performs unexpectedly, United Guardian can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in United Guardian will offset losses from the drop in United Guardian's long position.NISOURCE vs. United Guardian | NISOURCE vs. Church Dwight | NISOURCE vs. Coty Inc | NISOURCE vs. Estee Lauder Companies |
United Guardian vs. Utah Medical Products | United Guardian vs. Union Bankshares | United Guardian vs. Psychemedics | United Guardian vs. Unity Bancorp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.
Other Complementary Tools
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets |