Correlation Between KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Abercrombie Fitch, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in KINDER with a short position of Abercrombie Fitch. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch.

Diversification Opportunities for KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch

-0.45
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between KINDER and Abercrombie is -0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Abercrombie Fitch in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Abercrombie Fitch and KINDER is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY are associated (or correlated) with Abercrombie Fitch. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Abercrombie Fitch has no effect on the direction of KINDER i.e., KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is expected to generate 0.48 times more return on investment than Abercrombie Fitch. However, KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is 2.08 times less risky than Abercrombie Fitch. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Abercrombie Fitch is currently generating about -0.31 per unit of risk. If you would invest  10,402  in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on December 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (61.00) from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or give up 0.59% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy83.33%
ValuesDaily Returns

KINDER MORGAN ENERGY  vs.  Abercrombie Fitch

 Performance 
       Timeline  
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Abercrombie Fitch 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Abercrombie Fitch has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch

The main advantage of trading using opposite KINDER and Abercrombie Fitch positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if KINDER position performs unexpectedly, Abercrombie Fitch can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Abercrombie Fitch will offset losses from the drop in Abercrombie Fitch's long position.
The idea behind KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Abercrombie Fitch pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets