Correlation Between KINDER and Cadence Design

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both KINDER and Cadence Design at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining KINDER and Cadence Design into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Cadence Design Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on KINDER and Cadence Design and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in KINDER with a short position of Cadence Design. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of KINDER and Cadence Design.

Diversification Opportunities for KINDER and Cadence Design

-0.19

Correlation Coefficient

KINDER  Cadence Design

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between KINDER and Cadence is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Cadence Design Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cadence Design Systems and KINDER is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY are associated (or correlated) with Cadence Design. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cadence Design Systems has no effect on the direction of KINDER i.e., KINDER and Cadence Design go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between KINDER and Cadence Design

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is expected to under-perform the Cadence Design. But the bond apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is 3.66 times less risky than Cadence Design. The bond trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Cadence Design Systems is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  26,286  in Cadence Design Systems on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,100  from holding Cadence Design Systems or generate 15.6% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	95.24%
Values	Daily Returns

KINDER MORGAN ENERGY  vs.  Cadence Design Systems

KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Cadence Design Systems

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cadence Design Systems are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Cadence Design unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with KINDER and Cadence Design

The main advantage of trading using opposite KINDER and Cadence Design positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if KINDER position performs unexpectedly, Cadence Design can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cadence Design will offset losses from the drop in Cadence Design's long position.

The idea behind KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Cadence Design Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.