Correlation Between KINDER and Bank of America

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both KINDER and Bank of America at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining KINDER and Bank of America into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Bank of America, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on KINDER and Bank of America and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in KINDER with a short position of Bank of America. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of KINDER and Bank of America.

Diversification Opportunities for KINDER and Bank of America

0.55
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between KINDER and Bank is 0.55. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Bank of America in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of America and KINDER is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY are associated (or correlated) with Bank of America. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of America has no effect on the direction of KINDER i.e., KINDER and Bank of America go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between KINDER and Bank of America

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is expected to generate 1.07 times more return on investment than Bank of America. However, KINDER is 1.07 times more volatile than Bank of America. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of America is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  10,936  in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  151.00  from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or generate 1.38% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.12%
ValuesDaily Returns

KINDER MORGAN ENERGY  vs.  Bank of America

 Performance 
       Timeline  
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

KINDER and Bank of America Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with KINDER and Bank of America

The main advantage of trading using opposite KINDER and Bank of America positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if KINDER position performs unexpectedly, Bank of America can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of America will offset losses from the drop in Bank of America's long position.
The idea behind KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Bank of America pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios