Correlation Between KINDER and GMS
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and GMS Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on KINDER and GMS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in KINDER with a short position of GMS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of KINDER and GMS.
Diversification Opportunities for KINDER and GMS
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between KINDER and GMS is 0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and GMS Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GMS Inc and KINDER is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY are associated (or correlated) with GMS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GMS Inc has no effect on the direction of KINDER i.e., KINDER and GMS go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between KINDER and GMS
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is expected to generate 0.69 times more return on investment than GMS. However, KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is 1.44 times less risky than GMS. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GMS Inc is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest 11,113 in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on December 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (6.00) from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or give up 0.05% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 98.39% |
Values | Daily Returns |
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY vs. GMS Inc
Performance |
Timeline |
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY |
GMS Inc |
KINDER and GMS Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with KINDER and GMS
The main advantage of trading using opposite KINDER and GMS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if KINDER position performs unexpectedly, GMS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GMS will offset losses from the drop in GMS's long position.KINDER vs. Vera Bradley | KINDER vs. Fevertree Drinks Plc | KINDER vs. Molson Coors Beverage | KINDER vs. Keurig Dr Pepper |
GMS vs. Quanex Building Products | GMS vs. Apogee Enterprises | GMS vs. Azek Company | GMS vs. Beacon Roofing Supply |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |