Correlation Between 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CSX P 325 and Grupo Simec SAB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in 126408HH9 with a short position of Grupo Simec. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec.
Diversification Opportunities for 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec
0.28 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between 126408HH9 and Grupo is 0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CSX P 325 and Grupo Simec SAB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Grupo Simec SAB and 126408HH9 is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CSX P 325 are associated (or correlated) with Grupo Simec. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Grupo Simec SAB has no effect on the direction of 126408HH9 i.e., 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon CSX P 325 is expected to under-perform the Grupo Simec. But the bond apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, CSX P 325 is 5.68 times less risky than Grupo Simec. The bond trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Grupo Simec SAB is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2,700 in Grupo Simec SAB on September 18, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (11.00) from holding Grupo Simec SAB or give up 0.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
CSX P 325 vs. Grupo Simec SAB
Performance |
Timeline |
CSX P 325 |
Grupo Simec SAB |
126408HH9 and Grupo Simec Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec
The main advantage of trading using opposite 126408HH9 and Grupo Simec positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if 126408HH9 position performs unexpectedly, Grupo Simec can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Grupo Simec will offset losses from the drop in Grupo Simec's long position.126408HH9 vs. Osaka Steel Co, | 126408HH9 vs. Grupo Simec SAB | 126408HH9 vs. Ultra Clean Holdings | 126408HH9 vs. Westinghouse Air Brake |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |