Correlation Between United Rentals and KROGER
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between United Rentals and KROGER 54 percent, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on United Rentals and KROGER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in United Rentals with a short position of KROGER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of United Rentals and KROGER.
Diversification Opportunities for United Rentals and KROGER
-0.29 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between United and KROGER is -0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding United Rentals and KROGER 54 percent in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KROGER 54 percent and United Rentals is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on United Rentals are associated (or correlated) with KROGER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KROGER 54 percent has no effect on the direction of United Rentals i.e., United Rentals and KROGER go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between United Rentals and KROGER
Considering the 90-day investment horizon United Rentals is expected to under-perform the KROGER. In addition to that, United Rentals is 2.2 times more volatile than KROGER 54 percent. It trades about -0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. KROGER 54 percent is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 9,751 in KROGER 54 percent on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (22.00) from holding KROGER 54 percent or give up 0.23% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 59.68% |
Values | Daily Returns |
United Rentals vs. KROGER 54 percent
Performance |
Timeline |
United Rentals |
KROGER 54 percent |
United Rentals and KROGER Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with United Rentals and KROGER
The main advantage of trading using opposite United Rentals and KROGER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if United Rentals position performs unexpectedly, KROGER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KROGER will offset losses from the drop in KROGER's long position.United Rentals vs. HE Equipment Services | United Rentals vs. GATX Corporation | United Rentals vs. McGrath RentCorp | United Rentals vs. Alta Equipment Group |
KROGER vs. Ebang International Holdings | KROGER vs. BioNTech SE | KROGER vs. Franklin Wireless Corp | KROGER vs. Paysafe |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |