Correlation Between UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between UnitedHealth Group CDR and Transcontinental, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in UnitedHealth Group with a short position of Transcontinental. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental.

Diversification Opportunities for UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental

-0.53

Correlation Coefficient

UnitedHealth Group  Transcontinental

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between UnitedHealth and Transcontinental is -0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding UnitedHealth Group CDR and Transcontinental in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Transcontinental and UnitedHealth Group is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on UnitedHealth Group CDR are associated (or correlated) with Transcontinental. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Transcontinental has no effect on the direction of UnitedHealth Group i.e., UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon UnitedHealth Group is expected to generate 6.18 times less return on investment than Transcontinental. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, UnitedHealth Group CDR is 2.65 times less risky than Transcontinental. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Transcontinental is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,583  in Transcontinental on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  222.00  from holding Transcontinental or generate 14.02% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	75.56%
Values	Daily Returns

UnitedHealth Group CDR  vs.  Transcontinental

UnitedHealth Group CDR

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days UnitedHealth Group CDR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Transcontinental

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Transcontinental are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Transcontinental is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Pair Trading with UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental

The main advantage of trading using opposite UnitedHealth Group and Transcontinental positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if UnitedHealth Group position performs unexpectedly, Transcontinental can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Transcontinental will offset losses from the drop in Transcontinental's long position.

The idea behind UnitedHealth Group CDR and Transcontinental pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.