Correlation Between Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Allocation Servative and Income Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Allocation: with a short position of Income Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Income is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Allocation Servative and Income Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Income Growth and Strategic Allocation: is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Allocation Servative are associated (or correlated) with Income Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Income Growth has no effect on the direction of Strategic Allocation: i.e., Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Allocation Servative is expected to generate 0.56 times more return on investment than Income Growth. However, Strategic Allocation Servative is 1.79 times less risky than Income Growth. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Income Growth Fund is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  541.00  in Strategic Allocation Servative on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.00) from holding Strategic Allocation Servative or give up 0.18% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Strategic Allocation Servative  vs.  Income Growth Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Strategic Allocation: 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Strategic Allocation Servative has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Strategic Allocation: is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Income Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Income Growth Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Income Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Allocation: position performs unexpectedly, Income Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Income Growth will offset losses from the drop in Income Growth's long position.
The idea behind Strategic Allocation Servative and Income Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities