Correlation Between Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation:

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation: at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation: into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Balanced Fund Investor and Strategic Allocation Aggressive, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation: and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Balanced Fund with a short position of Strategic Allocation:. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation:.

Diversification Opportunities for Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation:

0.85
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Balanced and Strategic is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Balanced Fund Investor and Strategic Allocation Aggressiv in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Allocation: and Balanced Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Balanced Fund Investor are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Allocation:. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Allocation: has no effect on the direction of Balanced Fund i.e., Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation: go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation:

Assuming the 90 days horizon Balanced Fund Investor is expected to under-perform the Strategic Allocation:. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Balanced Fund Investor is 1.11 times less risky than Strategic Allocation:. The mutual fund trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Strategic Allocation Aggressive is currently generating about -0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  778.00  in Strategic Allocation Aggressive on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (10.00) from holding Strategic Allocation Aggressive or give up 1.29% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Balanced Fund Investor  vs.  Strategic Allocation Aggressiv

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Balanced Fund Investor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Balanced Fund Investor has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Balanced Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Strategic Allocation: 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Strategic Allocation Aggressive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Allocation: is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation: Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation:

The main advantage of trading using opposite Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation: positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Balanced Fund position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Allocation: can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Allocation: will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Allocation:'s long position.
The idea behind Balanced Fund Investor and Strategic Allocation Aggressive pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years