Correlation Between Trade Desk and Monolithic Power

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Trade Desk and Monolithic Power at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Trade Desk and Monolithic Power into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Trade Desk and Monolithic Power Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Trade Desk and Monolithic Power and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Trade Desk with a short position of Monolithic Power. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Trade Desk and Monolithic Power.

Diversification Opportunities for Trade Desk and Monolithic Power

0.2
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Trade and Monolithic is 0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Trade Desk and Monolithic Power Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Monolithic Power Systems and Trade Desk is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Trade Desk are associated (or correlated) with Monolithic Power. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Monolithic Power Systems has no effect on the direction of Trade Desk i.e., Trade Desk and Monolithic Power go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Trade Desk and Monolithic Power

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Trade Desk is expected to under-perform the Monolithic Power. In addition to that, Trade Desk is 1.36 times more volatile than Monolithic Power Systems. It trades about -0.21 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Monolithic Power Systems is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  60,240  in Monolithic Power Systems on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (96.00) from holding Monolithic Power Systems or give up 0.16% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Trade Desk  vs.  Monolithic Power Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Trade Desk 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Trade Desk has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Monolithic Power Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Monolithic Power Systems are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Monolithic Power is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Trade Desk and Monolithic Power Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Trade Desk and Monolithic Power

The main advantage of trading using opposite Trade Desk and Monolithic Power positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Trade Desk position performs unexpectedly, Monolithic Power can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monolithic Power will offset losses from the drop in Monolithic Power's long position.
The idea behind Trade Desk and Monolithic Power Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum