Correlation Between Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Thrivent Natural Resources and Goldman Sachs Dynamic, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Thrivent Natural with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Thrivent and Goldman is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Thrivent Natural Resources and Goldman Sachs Dynamic in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Dynamic and Thrivent Natural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Thrivent Natural Resources are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Dynamic has no effect on the direction of Thrivent Natural i.e., Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Thrivent Natural is expected to generate 3.1 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Thrivent Natural Resources is 14.15 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.38 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Dynamic is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,052  in Goldman Sachs Dynamic on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  87.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Dynamic or generate 4.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Thrivent Natural Resources  vs.  Goldman Sachs Dynamic

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Thrivent Natural Res 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

29 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thrivent Natural Resources are ranked lower than 29 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Thrivent Natural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Dynamic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Dynamic are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Thrivent Natural and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Thrivent Natural position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Thrivent Natural Resources and Goldman Sachs Dynamic pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data