Correlation Between Scientific Games and United States

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and United States at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and United States into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and United States Cellular, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and United States and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of United States. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and United States.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and United States

0.2

Correlation Coefficient

Scientific Games  United States

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and United is 0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and United States Cellular in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on United States Cellular and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with United States. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of United States Cellular has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and United States go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and United States

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to generate 3.86 times less return on investment than United States. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Scientific Games is 2.46 times less risky than United States. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. United States Cellular is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,310  in United States Cellular on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,840  from holding United States Cellular or generate 369.47% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  United States Cellular

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

United States Cellular

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in United States Cellular are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, United States reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and United States

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and United States positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, United States can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in United States will offset losses from the drop in United States' long position.

The idea behind Scientific Games and United States Cellular pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.