Correlation Between Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings PCL, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Intouch Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings

0.23

Correlation Coefficient

Scientific Games  Intouch Holdings

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Intouch is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings PCL in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Intouch Holdings PCL and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Intouch Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Intouch Holdings PCL has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to under-perform the Intouch Holdings. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Scientific Games is 1.76 times less risky than Intouch Holdings. The stock trades about -0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Intouch Holdings PCL is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  258.00  in Intouch Holdings PCL on October 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  10.00  from holding Intouch Holdings PCL or generate 3.88% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Intouch Holdings PCL

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Scientific Games may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Intouch Holdings PCL

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Intouch Holdings PCL are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Intouch Holdings may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Intouch Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Intouch Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Intouch Holdings' long position.

The idea behind Scientific Games and Intouch Holdings PCL pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.