Correlation Between Scientific Games and Crown Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Crown Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Crown Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Crown Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Crown Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Crown Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Crown Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Crown Holdings

0.42
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Crown is 0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Crown Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Crown Holdings and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Crown Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Crown Holdings has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Crown Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Crown Holdings

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to generate 1.37 times more return on investment than Crown Holdings. However, Scientific Games is 1.37 times more volatile than Crown Holdings. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Crown Holdings is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8,100  in Scientific Games on December 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,300  from holding Scientific Games or generate 16.05% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Crown Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Scientific Games reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Crown Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Crown Holdings are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Crown Holdings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Scientific Games and Crown Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Crown Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Crown Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Crown Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Crown Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Crown Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Scientific Games and Crown Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules