Correlation Between Scientific Games and Churchill Downs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Churchill Downs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Churchill Downs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Churchill Downs Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Churchill Downs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Churchill Downs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Churchill Downs.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Churchill Downs

0.25

Correlation Coefficient

Scientific Games  Churchill Downs

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Churchill is 0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Churchill Downs Incorporated in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Churchill Downs and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Churchill Downs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Churchill Downs has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Churchill Downs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Churchill Downs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to under-perform the Churchill Downs. In addition to that, Scientific Games is 1.8 times more volatile than Churchill Downs Incorporated. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Churchill Downs Incorporated is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  12,561  in Churchill Downs Incorporated on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  639.00  from holding Churchill Downs Incorporated or generate 5.09% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	98.46%
Values	Daily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Churchill Downs Incorporated

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Churchill Downs

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Churchill Downs Incorporated are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Churchill Downs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Churchill Downs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Churchill Downs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Churchill Downs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Churchill Downs will offset losses from the drop in Churchill Downs' long position.

The idea behind Scientific Games and Churchill Downs Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.