Correlation Between Scientific Games and Spirent Communications

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Spirent Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Spirent Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Spirent Communications plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Spirent Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Spirent Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Spirent Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Spirent Communications

-0.1

Correlation Coefficient

Scientific Games  Spirent Communications

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Spirent is -0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Spirent Communications plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spirent Communications and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Spirent Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spirent Communications has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Spirent Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Spirent Communications

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to generate 3.5 times less return on investment than Spirent Communications. In addition to that, Scientific Games is 1.03 times more volatile than Spirent Communications plc. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Spirent Communications plc is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  204.00  in Spirent Communications plc on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  12.00  from holding Spirent Communications plc or generate 5.88% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Spirent Communications plc

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Spirent Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Spirent Communications plc are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unfluctuating basic indicators, Spirent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Spirent Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Spirent Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Spirent Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spirent Communications will offset losses from the drop in Spirent Communications' long position.

The idea behind Scientific Games and Spirent Communications plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.