Correlation Between Scientific Games and Adobe

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and Adobe at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and Adobe into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and Adobe Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and Adobe and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of Adobe. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and Adobe.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and Adobe

-0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and Adobe is -0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and Adobe Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Adobe Inc and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with Adobe. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Adobe Inc has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and Adobe go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and Adobe

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to generate 1.31 times more return on investment than Adobe. However, Scientific Games is 1.31 times more volatile than Adobe Inc. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Adobe Inc is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8,100  in Scientific Games on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,400  from holding Scientific Games or generate 17.28% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  Adobe Inc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Scientific Games reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Adobe Inc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Adobe Inc has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Scientific Games and Adobe Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and Adobe

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and Adobe positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, Adobe can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Adobe will offset losses from the drop in Adobe's long position.
The idea behind Scientific Games and Adobe Inc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation