Correlation Between Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Transamerica Intermediate Muni and Precious Metals Ultrasector, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Transamerica Intermediate with a short position of Precious Metals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals.

Diversification Opportunities for Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals

-0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Transamerica and Precious is -0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Transamerica Intermediate Muni and Precious Metals Ultrasector in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Precious Metals Ultr and Transamerica Intermediate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Transamerica Intermediate Muni are associated (or correlated) with Precious Metals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Precious Metals Ultr has no effect on the direction of Transamerica Intermediate i.e., Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals

Assuming the 90 days horizon Transamerica Intermediate is expected to generate 14.16 times less return on investment than Precious Metals. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Transamerica Intermediate Muni is 12.91 times less risky than Precious Metals. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Precious Metals Ultrasector is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,636  in Precious Metals Ultrasector on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,519  from holding Precious Metals Ultrasector or generate 41.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.6%
ValuesDaily Returns

Transamerica Intermediate Muni  vs.  Precious Metals Ultrasector

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Transamerica Intermediate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Transamerica Intermediate Muni has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Transamerica Intermediate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Precious Metals Ultr 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Precious Metals Ultrasector has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's forward indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Transamerica Intermediate and Precious Metals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Transamerica Intermediate position performs unexpectedly, Precious Metals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Precious Metals will offset losses from the drop in Precious Metals' long position.
The idea behind Transamerica Intermediate Muni and Precious Metals Ultrasector pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk