Correlation Between Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Technology Ultrasector Profund and Nasdaq 100 Profund Nasdaq 100, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Technology Ultrasector with a short position of Nasdaq-100 Profund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund.

Diversification Opportunities for Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Technology and Nasdaq-100 is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Technology Ultrasector Profund and Nasdaq 100 Profund Nasdaq 100 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nasdaq 100 Profund and Technology Ultrasector is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Technology Ultrasector Profund are associated (or correlated) with Nasdaq-100 Profund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nasdaq 100 Profund has no effect on the direction of Technology Ultrasector i.e., Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Technology Ultrasector Profund is expected to generate 1.82 times more return on investment than Nasdaq-100 Profund. However, Technology Ultrasector is 1.82 times more volatile than Nasdaq 100 Profund Nasdaq 100. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Nasdaq 100 Profund Nasdaq 100 is currently generating about 0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,712  in Technology Ultrasector Profund on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  502.00  from holding Technology Ultrasector Profund or generate 18.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Technology Ultrasector Profund  vs.  Nasdaq 100 Profund Nasdaq 100

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Technology Ultrasector 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Technology Ultrasector Profund are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Technology Ultrasector showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Nasdaq 100 Profund 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nasdaq 100 Profund Nasdaq 100 are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Nasdaq-100 Profund may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Technology Ultrasector and Nasdaq-100 Profund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Technology Ultrasector position performs unexpectedly, Nasdaq-100 Profund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nasdaq-100 Profund will offset losses from the drop in Nasdaq-100 Profund's long position.
The idea behind Technology Ultrasector Profund and Nasdaq 100 Profund Nasdaq 100 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm