Correlation Between Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Templeton Growth Fund and Goldman Sachs Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Templeton Growth with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Templeton and Goldman is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Templeton Growth Fund and Goldman Sachs Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Emerging and Templeton Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Templeton Growth Fund are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Emerging has no effect on the direction of Templeton Growth i.e., Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Templeton Growth is expected to generate 1.67 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Templeton Growth Fund is 1.2 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Emerging is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  864.00  in Goldman Sachs Emerging on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  41.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Emerging or generate 4.75% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Templeton Growth Fund  vs.  Goldman Sachs Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Templeton Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Templeton Growth Fund are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Templeton Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Emerging are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Templeton Growth and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Templeton Growth position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Templeton Growth Fund and Goldman Sachs Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios