Correlation Between Tradegate and Spirent Communications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Tradegate and Spirent Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Tradegate and Spirent Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandelsbank and Spirent Communications plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Tradegate and Spirent Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Tradegate with a short position of Spirent Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Tradegate and Spirent Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Tradegate and Spirent Communications

-0.16
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Tradegate and Spirent is -0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandels and Spirent Communications plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spirent Communications and Tradegate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandelsbank are associated (or correlated) with Spirent Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spirent Communications has no effect on the direction of Tradegate i.e., Tradegate and Spirent Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Tradegate and Spirent Communications

Assuming the 90 days horizon Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandelsbank is expected to under-perform the Spirent Communications. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandelsbank is 1.17 times less risky than Spirent Communications. The stock trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Spirent Communications plc is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  202.00  in Spirent Communications plc on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  14.00  from holding Spirent Communications plc or generate 6.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandels  vs.  Spirent Communications plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Tradegate AG Wertpap 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandelsbank has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Tradegate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Spirent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Spirent Communications plc are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Spirent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Tradegate and Spirent Communications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Tradegate and Spirent Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Tradegate and Spirent Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Tradegate position performs unexpectedly, Spirent Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spirent Communications will offset losses from the drop in Spirent Communications' long position.
The idea behind Tradegate AG Wertpapierhandelsbank and Spirent Communications plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets