Correlation Between Summit Materials and Zapata Computing

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Summit Materials and Zapata Computing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Summit Materials and Zapata Computing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Summit Materials and Zapata Computing Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Summit Materials and Zapata Computing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Summit Materials with a short position of Zapata Computing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Summit Materials and Zapata Computing.

Diversification Opportunities for Summit Materials and Zapata Computing

-0.77

Correlation Coefficient

Summit Materials  Zapata Computing

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Summit and Zapata is -0.77. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Summit Materials and Zapata Computing Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zapata Computing Holdings and Summit Materials is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Summit Materials are associated (or correlated) with Zapata Computing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zapata Computing Holdings has no effect on the direction of Summit Materials i.e., Summit Materials and Zapata Computing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Summit Materials and Zapata Computing

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Summit Materials is expected to generate 20.24 times less return on investment than Zapata Computing. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Summit Materials is 29.97 times less risky than Zapata Computing. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zapata Computing Holdings is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.70  in Zapata Computing Holdings on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.14) from holding Zapata Computing Holdings or give up 84.86% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	66.14%
Values	Daily Returns

Summit Materials  vs.  Zapata Computing Holdings

Summit Materials

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Summit Materials are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unsteady basic indicators, Summit Materials displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Zapata Computing Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Good

Over the last 90 days Zapata Computing Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly unfluctuating basic indicators, Zapata Computing showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Summit Materials and Zapata Computing

The main advantage of trading using opposite Summit Materials and Zapata Computing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Summit Materials position performs unexpectedly, Zapata Computing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zapata Computing will offset losses from the drop in Zapata Computing's long position.

The idea behind Summit Materials and Zapata Computing Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.