Correlation Between Constellation Brands and Apollo Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Constellation Brands and Apollo Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Constellation Brands and Apollo Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Constellation Brands Class and Apollo Global Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Constellation Brands and Apollo Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Constellation Brands with a short position of Apollo Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Constellation Brands and Apollo Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Constellation Brands and Apollo Global

-0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Constellation and Apollo is -0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Constellation Brands Class and Apollo Global Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Apollo Global Management and Constellation Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Constellation Brands Class are associated (or correlated) with Apollo Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Apollo Global Management has no effect on the direction of Constellation Brands i.e., Constellation Brands and Apollo Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Constellation Brands and Apollo Global

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Constellation Brands Class is expected to under-perform the Apollo Global. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Constellation Brands Class is 1.97 times less risky than Apollo Global. The stock trades about -0.6 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Apollo Global Management is currently generating about -0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,037  in Apollo Global Management on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (468.00) from holding Apollo Global Management or give up 5.18% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Constellation Brands Class  vs.  Apollo Global Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Constellation Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Constellation Brands Class has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.
Apollo Global Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Apollo Global Management are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat conflicting basic indicators, Apollo Global sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Constellation Brands and Apollo Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Constellation Brands and Apollo Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Constellation Brands and Apollo Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Constellation Brands position performs unexpectedly, Apollo Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Apollo Global will offset losses from the drop in Apollo Global's long position.
The idea behind Constellation Brands Class and Apollo Global Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas