Correlation Between Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Smithson Investment Trust and Lloyds Banking Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Smithson Investment with a short position of Lloyds Banking. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking.

Diversification Opportunities for Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking

0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Smithson and Lloyds is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Smithson Investment Trust and Lloyds Banking Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lloyds Banking Group and Smithson Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Smithson Investment Trust are associated (or correlated) with Lloyds Banking. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lloyds Banking Group has no effect on the direction of Smithson Investment i.e., Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Smithson Investment Trust is expected to generate 2.21 times more return on investment than Lloyds Banking. However, Smithson Investment is 2.21 times more volatile than Lloyds Banking Group. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Lloyds Banking Group is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  142,200  in Smithson Investment Trust on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,600  from holding Smithson Investment Trust or generate 5.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Smithson Investment Trust  vs.  Lloyds Banking Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Smithson Investment Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smithson Investment Trust are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Smithson Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Lloyds Banking Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Lloyds Banking Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Lloyds Banking is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking

The main advantage of trading using opposite Smithson Investment and Lloyds Banking positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Smithson Investment position performs unexpectedly, Lloyds Banking can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lloyds Banking will offset losses from the drop in Lloyds Banking's long position.
The idea behind Smithson Investment Trust and Lloyds Banking Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments