Correlation Between Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Smithson Investment Trust and Hargreaves Lansdown plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Smithson Investment with a short position of Hargreaves Lansdown. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown.

Diversification Opportunities for Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Smithson and Hargreaves is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Smithson Investment Trust and Hargreaves Lansdown plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hargreaves Lansdown plc and Smithson Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Smithson Investment Trust are associated (or correlated) with Hargreaves Lansdown. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hargreaves Lansdown plc has no effect on the direction of Smithson Investment i.e., Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Smithson Investment Trust is expected to under-perform the Hargreaves Lansdown. In addition to that, Smithson Investment is 6.79 times more volatile than Hargreaves Lansdown plc. It trades about -0.18 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Hargreaves Lansdown plc is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  109,500  in Hargreaves Lansdown plc on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  300.00  from holding Hargreaves Lansdown plc or generate 0.27% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Smithson Investment Trust  vs.  Hargreaves Lansdown plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Smithson Investment Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smithson Investment Trust are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Smithson Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Hargreaves Lansdown plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hargreaves Lansdown plc are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, Hargreaves Lansdown is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown

The main advantage of trading using opposite Smithson Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Smithson Investment position performs unexpectedly, Hargreaves Lansdown can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hargreaves Lansdown will offset losses from the drop in Hargreaves Lansdown's long position.
The idea behind Smithson Investment Trust and Hargreaves Lansdown plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm