Correlation Between Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Smithson Investment Trust and Schroders Investment Trusts, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Smithson Investment with a short position of Schroders Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment

0.37
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Smithson and Schroders is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Smithson Investment Trust and Schroders Investment Trusts in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Schroders Investment and Smithson Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Smithson Investment Trust are associated (or correlated) with Schroders Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Schroders Investment has no effect on the direction of Smithson Investment i.e., Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Smithson Investment Trust is expected to generate 1.11 times more return on investment than Schroders Investment. However, Smithson Investment is 1.11 times more volatile than Schroders Investment Trusts. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Schroders Investment Trusts is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  141,600  in Smithson Investment Trust on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  10,000  from holding Smithson Investment Trust or generate 7.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.46%
ValuesDaily Returns

Smithson Investment Trust  vs.  Schroders Investment Trusts

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Smithson Investment Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smithson Investment Trust are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Smithson Investment may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Schroders Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Schroders Investment Trusts are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Schroders Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Smithson Investment and Schroders Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Smithson Investment position performs unexpectedly, Schroders Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Schroders Investment will offset losses from the drop in Schroders Investment's long position.
The idea behind Smithson Investment Trust and Schroders Investment Trusts pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance