Correlation Between Smithson Investment and Universal Health

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Smithson Investment and Universal Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Smithson Investment and Universal Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Smithson Investment Trust and Universal Health Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Smithson Investment and Universal Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Smithson Investment with a short position of Universal Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Smithson Investment and Universal Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Smithson Investment and Universal Health

-0.69

Correlation Coefficient

Smithson Investment  Universal Health

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Smithson and Universal is -0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Smithson Investment Trust and Universal Health Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Universal Health Services and Smithson Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Smithson Investment Trust are associated (or correlated) with Universal Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Universal Health Services has no effect on the direction of Smithson Investment i.e., Smithson Investment and Universal Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Smithson Investment and Universal Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Smithson Investment is expected to generate 3.57 times less return on investment than Universal Health. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Smithson Investment Trust is 1.5 times less risky than Universal Health. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Universal Health Services is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  14,277  in Universal Health Services on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,902  from holding Universal Health Services or generate 27.33% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	86.25%
Values	Daily Returns

Smithson Investment Trust  vs.  Universal Health Services

Smithson Investment Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smithson Investment Trust are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Smithson Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Universal Health Services

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Universal Health Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Pair Trading with Smithson Investment and Universal Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Smithson Investment and Universal Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Smithson Investment position performs unexpectedly, Universal Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Universal Health will offset losses from the drop in Universal Health's long position.

The idea behind Smithson Investment Trust and Universal Health Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.