Correlation Between Sportsquest and Sack Lunch

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sportsquest and Sack Lunch at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sportsquest and Sack Lunch into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sportsquest and Sack Lunch Productions, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sportsquest and Sack Lunch and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sportsquest with a short position of Sack Lunch. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sportsquest and Sack Lunch.

Diversification Opportunities for Sportsquest and Sack Lunch

0.25
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sportsquest and Sack is 0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sportsquest and Sack Lunch Productions in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sack Lunch Productions and Sportsquest is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sportsquest are associated (or correlated) with Sack Lunch. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sack Lunch Productions has no effect on the direction of Sportsquest i.e., Sportsquest and Sack Lunch go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sportsquest and Sack Lunch

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Sportsquest is expected to generate 1.8 times less return on investment than Sack Lunch. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Sportsquest is 1.23 times less risky than Sack Lunch. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sack Lunch Productions is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1.70  in Sack Lunch Productions on December 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.20) from holding Sack Lunch Productions or give up 11.76% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sportsquest  vs.  Sack Lunch Productions

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sportsquest 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sportsquest are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Sportsquest unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Sack Lunch Productions 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sack Lunch Productions are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite uncertain forward-looking signals, Sack Lunch disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Sportsquest and Sack Lunch Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sportsquest and Sack Lunch

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sportsquest and Sack Lunch positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sportsquest position performs unexpectedly, Sack Lunch can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sack Lunch will offset losses from the drop in Sack Lunch's long position.
The idea behind Sportsquest and Sack Lunch Productions pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm