Correlation Between SL Green and Dine Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SL Green and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SL Green and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SL Green Realty and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SL Green and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SL Green with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SL Green and Dine Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for SL Green and Dine Brands

0.49
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between SLG and Dine is 0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SL Green Realty and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and SL Green is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SL Green Realty are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of SL Green i.e., SL Green and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between SL Green and Dine Brands

Considering the 90-day investment horizon SL Green is expected to generate 1.18 times less return on investment than Dine Brands. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, SL Green Realty is 1.99 times less risky than Dine Brands. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dine Brands Global is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,969  in Dine Brands Global on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  148.00  from holding Dine Brands Global or generate 4.98% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

SL Green Realty  vs.  Dine Brands Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
SL Green Realty 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in SL Green Realty are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak essential indicators, SL Green may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Dine Brands may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

SL Green and Dine Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with SL Green and Dine Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite SL Green and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SL Green position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.
The idea behind SL Green Realty and Dine Brands Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.

Other Complementary Tools

Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance