Correlation Between Sierra Core and Franklin Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sierra Core and Franklin Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sierra Core and Franklin Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sierra E Retirement and Franklin Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sierra Core and Franklin Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sierra Core with a short position of Franklin Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sierra Core and Franklin Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Sierra Core and Franklin Growth

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sierra and Franklin is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sierra E Retirement and Franklin Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin Growth and Sierra Core is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sierra E Retirement are associated (or correlated) with Franklin Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin Growth has no effect on the direction of Sierra Core i.e., Sierra Core and Franklin Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sierra Core and Franklin Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Sierra E Retirement is expected to generate 0.34 times more return on investment than Franklin Growth. However, Sierra E Retirement is 2.96 times less risky than Franklin Growth. It trades about -0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin Growth Fund is currently generating about -0.33 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,326  in Sierra E Retirement on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (70.00) from holding Sierra E Retirement or give up 3.01% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sierra E Retirement  vs.  Franklin Growth Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sierra E Retirement 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sierra E Retirement has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Sierra Core is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Franklin Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Franklin Growth Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Sierra Core and Franklin Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sierra Core and Franklin Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sierra Core and Franklin Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sierra Core position performs unexpectedly, Franklin Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin Growth will offset losses from the drop in Franklin Growth's long position.
The idea behind Sierra E Retirement and Franklin Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies