Correlation Between Singhe Hospitals and E M
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Singhe Hospitals and E M L, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Singhe Hospitals and E M and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Singhe Hospitals with a short position of E M. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Singhe Hospitals and E M.
Diversification Opportunities for Singhe Hospitals and E M
0.33 | Correlation Coefficient |
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Singhe and EMLN0000 is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Singhe Hospitals and E M L in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on E M L and Singhe Hospitals is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Singhe Hospitals are associated (or correlated) with E M. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of E M L has no effect on the direction of Singhe Hospitals i.e., Singhe Hospitals and E M go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Singhe Hospitals and E M
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Singhe Hospitals is expected to generate 1.89 times less return on investment than E M. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Singhe Hospitals is 1.29 times less risky than E M. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. E M L is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 360.00 in E M L on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 60.00 from holding E M L or generate 16.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Singhe Hospitals vs. E M L
Performance |
Timeline |
Singhe Hospitals |
E M L |
Singhe Hospitals and E M Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Singhe Hospitals and E M
The main advantage of trading using opposite Singhe Hospitals and E M positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Singhe Hospitals position performs unexpectedly, E M can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in E M will offset losses from the drop in E M's long position.Singhe Hospitals vs. E M L | Singhe Hospitals vs. Lanka Credit and | Singhe Hospitals vs. VIDULLANKA PLC | Singhe Hospitals vs. EX PACK RUGATED CARTONS |
E M vs. Ceylon Tobacco | E M vs. John Keells Hotels | E M vs. Union Chemicals Lanka | E M vs. Peoples Insurance PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |