Correlation Between Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim High Yield and Fidelity Vertible Securities, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim High with a short position of Fidelity Vertible. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible

0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Fidelity is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim High Yield and Fidelity Vertible Securities in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Vertible and Guggenheim High is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim High Yield are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Vertible. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Vertible has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim High i.e., Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim High is expected to generate 2.59 times less return on investment than Fidelity Vertible. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Guggenheim High Yield is 3.15 times less risky than Fidelity Vertible. It trades about 0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Vertible Securities is currently generating about 0.21 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,640  in Fidelity Vertible Securities on September 18, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  93.00  from holding Fidelity Vertible Securities or generate 2.55% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim High Yield  vs.  Fidelity Vertible Securities

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim High Yield 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim High Yield are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Guggenheim High is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fidelity Vertible 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Vertible Securities are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Fidelity Vertible may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim High and Fidelity Vertible positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim High position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Vertible can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Vertible will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Vertible's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim High Yield and Fidelity Vertible Securities pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets