Correlation Between Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Shifa International Hospitals and Unilever Pakistan Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Shifa International with a short position of Unilever Pakistan. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan.

Diversification Opportunities for Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan

0.91
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Shifa and Unilever is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Shifa International Hospitals and Unilever Pakistan Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Unilever Pakistan Foods and Shifa International is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Shifa International Hospitals are associated (or correlated) with Unilever Pakistan. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Unilever Pakistan Foods has no effect on the direction of Shifa International i.e., Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Shifa International Hospitals is expected to generate 1.1 times more return on investment than Unilever Pakistan. However, Shifa International is 1.1 times more volatile than Unilever Pakistan Foods. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Unilever Pakistan Foods is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,143  in Shifa International Hospitals on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  25,057  from holding Shifa International Hospitals or generate 224.87% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy66.88%
ValuesDaily Returns

Shifa International Hospitals  vs.  Unilever Pakistan Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Shifa International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

22 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shifa International Hospitals are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Shifa International sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Unilever Pakistan Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

24 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Unilever Pakistan Foods are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Unilever Pakistan sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan

The main advantage of trading using opposite Shifa International and Unilever Pakistan positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Shifa International position performs unexpectedly, Unilever Pakistan can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Unilever Pakistan will offset losses from the drop in Unilever Pakistan's long position.
The idea behind Shifa International Hospitals and Unilever Pakistan Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope