Correlation Between SFS REAL and C I
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SFS REAL ESTATE and C I LEASING, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SFS REAL and C I and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SFS REAL with a short position of C I. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SFS REAL and C I.
Diversification Opportunities for SFS REAL and C I
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between SFS and CILEASING is -0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SFS REAL ESTATE and C I LEASING in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on C I LEASING and SFS REAL is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SFS REAL ESTATE are associated (or correlated) with C I. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of C I LEASING has no effect on the direction of SFS REAL i.e., SFS REAL and C I go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between SFS REAL and C I
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon SFS REAL ESTATE is expected to generate 0.33 times more return on investment than C I. However, SFS REAL ESTATE is 3.02 times less risky than C I. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. C I LEASING is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 17,945 in SFS REAL ESTATE on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2,655 from holding SFS REAL ESTATE or generate 14.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
SFS REAL ESTATE vs. C I LEASING
Performance |
Timeline |
SFS REAL ESTATE |
C I LEASING |
SFS REAL and C I Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with SFS REAL and C I
The main advantage of trading using opposite SFS REAL and C I positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SFS REAL position performs unexpectedly, C I can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in C I will offset losses from the drop in C I's long position.SFS REAL vs. CUSTODIAN INVESTMENT PLC | SFS REAL vs. STERLING FINANCIAL HOLDINGS | SFS REAL vs. ABC TRANSPORT PLC | SFS REAL vs. UNION HOMES REAL |
C I vs. CUSTODIAN INVESTMENT PLC | C I vs. NIGERIAN BREWERIES PLC | C I vs. INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GASES | C I vs. ABC TRANSPORT PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.
Other Complementary Tools
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges |